Research Areas

This research focuses on the archaeological and architectural analysis of the Giza Plateau, with particular attention to structural systems, underground contexts, and non-invasive field methodologies.

  • Osiris Shaft and underground structures
  • Khafre Causeway and architectural systems
  • Western Escarpment rock-cut features
  • Non-invasive field observation and analysis
Selected Publications

Open-Access Archaeological Research

Architectural Constraints and Interface Anomalies in the Osiris Shaft Complex

Osiris Shaft · Non-invasive documentary assessment

A non-invasive archaeological–architectural assessment focused on wall–floor junctions, interface discontinuities, and localized moisture signatures within the Osiris Shaft complex.

View DOI

Reconsidering the Osiris Shaft: Evidence for a Connected Subterranean Network

Giza Plateau · Subterranean architecture

Study exploring the Osiris Shaft within a broader subsurface architectural framework through photographic documentation and limited tomographic correlation.

View DOI

A Rock-Cut Cavity in the Western Escarpment of the Giza Plateau

Western Escarpment · Preliminary observational study

Preliminary documentation and contextual analysis of an isolated rock-cut cavity within the western escarpment of the Giza Plateau.

View DOI

Field Work

Ongoing field research conducted directly on the Giza Plateau, focused on structural observation, architectural analysis, and documentation of anomalies within complex archaeological contexts.

The work is based on direct, non-invasive observation and aims to identify architectural constraints, discontinuities, and contextual patterns often overlooked in conventional interpretations.

Contact & Collaboration

For research collaborations, institutional dialogue, or project-related inquiries, please get in touch directly.

Email: dott.armandomei@gmail.com

All research is conducted within a non-invasive, evidence-based framework grounded in direct field observation.

Support the Foundation

Support the development of the Egyptian Heritage Research Foundation – Preparatory Initiative, an independent project focused on non-invasive archaeological research, field documentation, and heritage preservation in Egypt.

Contributions help sustain:

  • Field documentation and on-site research
  • Open-access publications and reports
  • Non-invasive methodological development
  • Institutional preparation and legal structuring in Egypt
  • Long-term archaeological continuity

Learn More →

About Pyramids of Bosnia


From: Walter Cruttenden
(Binary Research Institute)


A geologist friend of mine, Robert Schoch, visited Bosnia, did a thorough investigation, and gave a report at the last CPAK (Conference on Precession and Ancient Knowledge http://www.cpakonline.com/) at the University of California in San Diego. He is a big proponent of ancient civilizations and famed for redating the Sphinx to a much older period but he had to report that the Bosnian site is not a pyramid, it is a natural mountain that just resembles a pyramid. There are some old Roman ruins (about 2000 years old) and a few excavations but there is no sign of any large super structure. Carbon dating of wood could be related to old campfires or temporary structures but without a pyramid they do not indicate any large civilization or advanced knowledge. There are many sites that exceed the dating limits applied by academia but we should forget Bosnia before it gives all of us in the alternative history camp a black eye.
Unlike Bosnia, Gobekli Tepe Turkey is an old site and has been verified by a number of well respected archaeologists.
Cheers
Walter


From: Armando & Nico
To: Walter Cruttenden

Robert Schoch is one of the most famous geologist in the world. We read his considerations about the Bosnian pyramids. However, we wish to know more about this site so may be we will be there in May for a private visit. We are awaiting for Semir Osmanagich confirmation.
Gobekli Tepe is a very interesting site. We have never been there, but this site seems similar to Stonehenge.
We have some questions:
Do you really think Gobekli Tepe was a temple?
Do you agree with dating (11,500/8,000 BC)?
Looking forward
Armando & Nico